Quartz 4

Research: Find Exact NOLO COGS in Earnings Transcripts

3 min read

Research: Find Exact NOLO COGS in Earnings Transcripts

Executive Summary

This source investigates the exact Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and unit economics for the Non-Alcoholic (NOLO) beverage category by analyzing corporate earnings transcripts, academic economic viability studies, and market research. It reveals that while multinational brewers like heineken-nv and anheuser-busch-inbev intentionally obscure exact per-hectoliter manufacturing costs behind blended metrics, the category is highly profitable. The high capital intensity and volume loss associated with dealcoholization are offset by massive excise-tax-savings, secondary revenue streams from reselling extracted ethanol, and strict adherence to premiumization strategies.

Key Findings

The Obfuscation of Exact COGS

Major brewers do not disclose specific per-SKU COGS (e.g., exact dollar cost per hectoliter for dealcoholization) in their public earnings calls. Instead, executives rely on blended “Price/Mix” and generic “cost productivity” metrics. However, executive commentary confirms that the NOLO category yields “disproportionate profitability,” particularly in the on-trade (bars and restaurants).

Dealcoholization Costs and Secondary Revenue

The dealcoholization process (e.g., reverse osmosis, vacuum distillation) introduces significant manufacturing friction:

  • Volume Loss: Extracting alcohol results in total volume loss, requiring more raw beer to be brewed to yield the same amount of 0.0% liquid.
  • Equipment Efficiency: Maintaining an overall-equipment-effectiveness-oee above 85% is critical for margin sustainability, requiring predictive maintenance on membrane filters.
  • Secondary Revenue: Brewers are offsetting these high costs by recovering the extracted ethanol and reselling it to the spirits and industrial sectors, creating a secondary revenue stream that subsidizes NOLO COGS.

Tax Arbitrage as the Margin Engine

The true driver of nolo-unit-economics is structural tax advantage. Academic models (e.g., Wageningen University) demonstrate the massive impact of tax classifications:

  • In the Netherlands, traditional beer carries an excise duty of approximately €37.96 per hL. Alcohol-free beer is legally categorized alongside soft drinks, dropping the duty to just €8.83 per hL.
  • Value-Added Tax (VAT) also drops from 21% for standard beer to a reduced food/beverage rate of 9% for alcohol-free alternatives.
  • When combined with price parity (premiumization), these excise-tax-savings far outweigh the added variable COGS of the dealcoholization process.

On-Trade Margin Expansion

heineken-nv is using on-trade draught installations as a primary margin expansion lever. By installing over 10,000 heineken-0-0 draught lines in Europe, the company captures high-margin bar and restaurant occasions, driving 24 consecutive quarters of growth for the brand.

Strategic Implications for Asahi

  • On-Trade Strategy: Asahi should evaluate its own on-trade draught strategy for [[asahi-super-dry-0-0]] to replicate Heineken’s margin expansion in high-profit venues.
  • Ethanol Resale: Asahi must optimize the recovery and resale of extracted ethanol from its dealcoholization facilities to maximize secondary revenue.
  • Data Gaps: To find exact dollar-figure COGS, research should pivot from multinational conglomerates to publicly traded pure-play craft brewers (e.g., examining potential S-1 filings from athletic-brewing).

Graph View